• Facebook
  • Rss
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Store
  • Donate
NCCS - National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Our Leadership
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • 2020 State of Cancer Survivorship Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Telehealth
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Cancer Convos Podcast
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • From Shadows to Life: A Biography of the Cancer Survivorship Movement
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • 2020 Stovall Awards
      • Honorees
      • Sponsors
      • Committees
      • Reception
      • Nominations
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Fall 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Symposium 2020
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • 0Shopping Cart

Year-End MATCH (DEADLINE Dec 31): Donate & Make a Difference | Donate

Ben Fishman

Poor Amendments Cannot Fix A Bad Bill

May 3, 2017/in Cancer News, Cancer Policy Blog, NCCS News Access to Care, Affordable Care Act, Financial Toxicity, Health Equity, Pre-Existing Conditions NCCS News /by actualize
Ben Fishman

Post by Ben Fishman

NCCS Board Member and Cancer Survivor

Three years ago this week, a specially-trained neurosurgeon opened up my scalp, and for the next 12 hours, he delicately resected as much of a golf-ball-sized tumor as possible without permanently damaging the area of my brain that controls speech and fine motor skills. The fact that I can type this article on a normal keyboard and read it aloud is a testament to the doctor’s skill. Without him, or the team who supported the procedure (I needed to be kept awake but sedated so I could respond to verbal cues), I wouldn’t be living the quality of life – or any life – today.

I was fortunate, not because I was diagnosed with a rare, often deadly brain cancer, but because I received exceptional care and I had excellent insurance that didn’t impose restrictions or annual or lifetime caps. If I was not married and relied on a student insurance plan or gambled on staying healthy without insurance, I would have been filing for bankruptcy the moment I consented to surgery. I would have been over a half-million dollars in the hole even before I started chemo and radiation. I had a lot of worries, but health insurance wasn’t one of them. Now I worry for patients like me.

“Congressman Fred Upton’s amendment to provide $8 billion to support high-risk pools is either missing a zero or is a disingenuous way to claim to his constituents with pre-existing conditions that he stood up for them. ”
The question of providing coverage to the most expensive patients gets to the heart of the debate about health care today. Among the most important revolutions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were the protections it granted to the millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions from being charged more or denied coverage due to their health status. To be precise, 52 million Americans under the age of 65 with conditions ranging from sleep apnea to pregnancy were often denied coverage. Cancer was at the top of the list of deniable conditions. There are an estimated 16 million cancer survivors today.

Republicans who have been trying to follow through on their pledge to repeal Obamacare have been struggling with the reality that many of the provisions of the ACA are popular, especially the protections for those with pre-existing conditions. True, in some areas in the U.S., there are problems with rising premiums and insurers leaving the individual marketplace. But the GOP’s American Health Care Act (AHCA) does not pretend to fix these problems. Instead, it proposes significant tax cuts for the wealthy, while causing 24 million people (14 million by 2018 alone) to lose coverage and raising premiums and deductibles for millions of Americans. The House leadership has failed to bring the AHCA to a vote twice because they couldn’t bring two wings of the party together: moderates, who believe in the pre-existing conditions protections enshrined in the ACA; and the Freedom Caucus, who want to minimize health care expenditures and regulations.

Arm-twisting and horse-trading along Pennsylvania Avenue threatens to revive an amended AHCA as early as tomorrow. At its core is a compromise between some Republican moderates who want to say they stood up for protecting pre-existing conditions and the Freedom Caucus who want to drop mandates on pre-existing conditions and essential health benefits (EHBs), such as maternity care and emergency room visits, that all plans must provide under the ACA. The MacArthur amendment would let states apply for waivers to allow them to set their own EHBs; enable insurers to set age ratios that would charge older people more than 5 times more for insurance (the ACA imposed a 3:1 age ratio); and allow insurers to resume health status underwriting. In other words, pre-existing conditions would be protected in name only since insurers could charge unaffordable premiums to patients.

Under the MacArthur amendment, states can obtain a waiver as long as they offer supposed substitutes for covering high-risk individuals. These high-risk pools have been tried before the ACA and had several inherent flaws. First, they are extremely expensive because they cover the most expensive patients by definition. They ran deficits even while covering a limited band of people. The 35 states that offered high-risk pools in 2011 (before the ACA) lost around $1.2 billion and only covered 226,000 people. These plans also set annual or lifetime coverage caps that could easily be exceeded by a few hospital stays or major procedures. Congressman Fred Upton’s amendment to provide $8 billion to support high-risk pools is either missing a zero or is a disingenuous way to claim to his constituents with pre-existing conditions that he stood up for them. Finally, as Mike Kappel, a fellow board member at NCCS, explains from his personal experience in Georgia’s high-risk pool, these programs operate under extremely restrictive conditions that lower-income individuals often cannot meet.

Jimmy Kimmel’s emotional monologue got at the core of our ongoing health care debate when he said “No parent should ever have to decide if they can afford to save their child’s life,” after his son was born last week with a major heart defect.

In response, former one-term Tea Party Congressman Joe Walsh tweeted, “Your sad story doesn’t obligate me or anybody else to pay for somebody else’s health care.”

Neither the MacArthur Amendment nor the Upton Amendment comes close to meeting the needs of cancer patients and survivors. Congress must hear from high-risk patients, and anyone who agrees with Jimmy Kimmel, that we don’t want to be treated as second-class citizens.

# # #

About the Author

Ben Fishman is a glioblastoma cancer survivor and joined the board of NCCS in 2017. He is a foreign policy and national security specialist who served at the White House from 2009-2013.

Follow Ben on Twitter: @fishman_b


Related Post

https://canceradvocacy.org/blog/cancer-survivors-experience-purchasing-insurance-before-aca/

Learn more about the ACA and the protections it provides »

Tags: Advocacy, affordable care act, AHCA, cancer care, financial toxicity, pre-existing conditions, repeal and replace
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/Ben-Fishman.jpg 515 1030 actualize https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png actualize2017-05-03 17:31:352020-11-23 11:38:23Poor Amendments Cannot Fix A Bad Bill
You might also like
Plans for Improving Cancer Survivorship Care ASCO Announces CancerLinQ, an Initiative to Transform Cancer Care
2019 Stovall Award Honorees Brereton and Dornsife and presenters NCCS Presents 4th Annual Ellen L. Stovall Award to Dr. Harmar Brereton and Dana Dornsife for Their Innovation and Dedication to Cancer Survivors
Fotolia 16642379 XS e1408628725208 Focus on the Care Video: Emily Lee Discusses Emerging Payment Models in Cancer Care
2018 Stovall Award presentation NCCS Presents 3rd Annual Ellen L. Stovall Award to Gay Crawford and Dr. Norman Coleman, Their 40+ Year Careers Focused on Improving Patient-Centered Cancer Care
Managing Stress Webinar feat COVID-19 and Cancer Panel Discussion: Managing Stress, Anxiety, and Grief During Uncertain Times
FacebookProfile3 When Talking About the End of Life, Honesty and Words Matter
NCCS Starburst Thumbnail WCOE: Planning for Hospice, Difficult Conversations, and Second Opinions
FacebookProfile3 CBO report says healthcare law could cause as many as 20M to lose coverage

Latest News

CDC Headquarters

NCCS Recommends That States Allocate COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer Care Providers

March 1, 2021
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) and the Cancer Leadership Council…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/CDC_Headquarters_PHIL_pubdomain_1200.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-03-01 15:49:432021-03-04 17:45:07NCCS Recommends That States Allocate COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer Care Providers
Coronavirus feat

COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer: A Conversation with Cancer Expert Otis Brawley, MD

March 1, 2021
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) hosted a conversation on February…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Coronavirus-feat.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-03-01 11:49:192021-03-02 16:15:47COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer: A Conversation with Cancer Expert Otis Brawley, MD
NCCS CancerAdvocacy.org

NCCS Joins Patient, Disability, and Health Care Organizations to Urge U.S. Supreme Court to Protect Medicaid and Rule Against Work Requirements

February 25, 2021
Loss of Patient Protections Would Raise Barriers to Health Insurance — Seventeen patient groups representing millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions filed an amicus curiae (“friend-of-the-court”) brief today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case Texas v. United States, citing the devastating impact patients would face should the court uphold the District Court ruling to invalidate the Affordable Care Act (ACA). [...]
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Canceradvocacy-org-default-image.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-02-25 17:48:242021-03-04 18:07:26NCCS Joins Patient, Disability, and Health Care Organizations to Urge U.S. Supreme Court to Protect Medicaid and Rule Against Work Requirements

Take Action

Stovall Award

The Ellen L. Stovall Award for Innovation in Patient-Centered Cancer Care is a unique opportunity for patients and survivors to recognize pioneers who are transforming the cancer care system.

Join CPAT

The NCCS Cancer Policy & Advocacy Team (CPAT) is a program for survivors and caregivers to learn about pressing policy issues that affect quality cancer care in order to be engaged as advocates in public policy around the needs of cancer survivors.

Share Your Story

NCCS represents the millions of Americans who share a common experience – the survivorship experience – living with, through and beyond a cancer diagnosis.

STAY CONNECTED

Together we can improve cancer care for survivors! Sign up to be the first to know about cancer policy issues and ways to take action

  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Our Leadership
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • 2020 State of Cancer Survivorship Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Telehealth
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Cancer Convos Podcast
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • From Shadows to Life: A Biography of the Cancer Survivorship Movement
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • 2020 Stovall Awards
      • Honorees
      • Sponsors
      • Committees
      • Reception
      • Nominations
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Fall 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Symposium 2020
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
8455 Colesville Road  |  Suite 930  |  Silver Spring, MD 20910
877-NCCS-YES  |  info@canceradvocacy.org
Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 1995-2021 by the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, NCCS, Cancer Survival Toolbox, and related Logos are registered in the United States as trademarks of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.

ACA Update | April 28, 2017: AHCA 2.0 Is Released (Worse for Patients than... ProtectOurCare 1024px Fotolia 23428619 S e1461260836640 NCCS Joins Cancer Organizations to Express Opposition to the American Health...
Scroll to top

Harmar Brereton, MD

Founder
Northeast Regional Cancer Institute

 

“Perhaps one of the most impactful collaborations in Dr. Brereton’s extraordinary career remains his early work and long friendship with Ellen Stovall. Through him, and in turn through the thousands of lives he has touched, Ellen’s work continues, and her mission lives on.”

—Karen M. Saunders
President, Northeast Regional Cancer Institute