• Facebook
  • Rss
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Store
  • Donate
NCCS - National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Our Leadership
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • 2020 State of Cancer Survivorship Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Telehealth
    • Survivorship Champions
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Cancer Convos Podcast
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • Nominations
      • Honorees
      • Sponsors
      • Committees
    • From Shadows to Life: A Biography of the Cancer Survivorship Movement
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2021 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Fall 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Symposium 2020
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • 0Shopping Cart

Year-End MATCH (DEADLINE Dec 31): Donate & Make a Difference | Donate

Living with Cancer

WCOE: Making Hard Choices and the Impact of Price Transparency

August 8, 2014/in Cancer News, Cancer Policy Blog Care Coordination, Care Planning, Clinical Guidelines, Quality Cancer Care NCCS News /by actualize
What Caught Our Eye (WCOE) Each week, we take a closer look at the cancer policy articles, studies, and stories that caught our attention.
Some physicians are reluctant to answer the question, “What would you do if you were in my shoes?”
In “Living with Cancer: Difficult Choices,” another installment in her series in The New York Times, Susan Gubar writes about the difficulty of deciding between treatment options when there is no obvious answer. Even patients who have a strong understanding of their disease may lack the expertise to evaluate different options, particularly when the options presented are radically different, and often equally unpalatable.

“I doubt that most people would want to return to the paternalism of the past when physicians monopolized medical decision making. Yet many of us need the guidance of our doctors whose training and experience make them better able to calculate the brutal risks,” Gubar writes.

Ideally, the process of decision-making should be shared, honoring the patient’s values and the physician’s expertise. Some physicians are reluctant to answer the question, “What would you do if you were in my shoes?” Yet we would argue that if physicians have the time to spend with their patients in a process of care planning, in which the patient’s values, needs, and preferences are discussed, then the physician will be better equipped to answer that question and provide much-needed guidance.

While Gubar’s physician ultimately says, “It’s up to you,” the decision-making is shared. “While appreciating my values and priorities, Dr. Matei uses her medical expertise not ‘to throw everything at it,’ but to counsel me,” Gubar writes.

MRI machine and screens

A study on the cost of MRIs caught our eye.

In another New York Times piece, “Why We Should Know the Price of Medical Tests,” Elisabeth Rosenthal reports on a study published in the journal Health Affairs on the impact of price transparency.

In the study, WellPoint provided consumers who had scheduled a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test with information about alternate, lower cost (but comparable quality) providers in their area. Consumers were offered assistance rescheduling the test but were not required to change their appointment. The results:

  • 15 percent of consumers changed their test to a lower cost center;
  • Over two years, the program saved $220 per test, or 18.7%; and
  • Hospitals in the geographic area lowered their prices, and by the end of the study, the price variation between hospitals and non-hospitals declined by 30%.

“The study also suggests that patients are more vigilant custodians of cost than their doctors. Several years ago, WellPoint gave physicians similar price information on scanning providers in their practice area but did not see a change in referral patterns,” Rosenthal wrote.

Whether the results observed in this study would apply to cancer care is debatable. The urgency and anxiety that accompany a cancer diagnosis and treatment may make price less of a factor for many individuals facing cancer. Insured individuals are likely to reach their out-of-pocket maximums each year – often early in the year – and so they may not be as sensitive to price differences. Yet we know that the cost of cancer treatment can result in serious financial consequences and bankruptcy for many individuals and families, so perhaps patients would be sensitive to differences in price for equivalent treatments.

Tags: cancer care, Cancer Survivorship, care planning, clinical guidelines, ePatient, quality, Susan Gubar, What Caught Our Eye
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/Living-with-Cancer-Difficult-Choices.jpg 667 1000 actualize https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png actualize2014-08-08 13:49:042020-11-27 13:20:47WCOE: Making Hard Choices and the Impact of Price Transparency
You might also like
HHS Humphrey bldg 1200 800x400 How to Voice Opposition to the Proposed Rule for Short-Term Limited Duration Coverage
Dome Thumbnail starburst NCCS Offers Policy Comments: Strategies for Increasing Patient Participation in FDA Review Activities
Fotolia 23428619 S e1461260836640 NCCS Responds to Draft ASCO Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options
NCCS Starburst 250px Health Care Roundup: Cancer Care Planning Bill Introduced; Drug Pricing Measures Advance; Rural Hospitals Struggling in States that Did Not Expand Medicaid; More
Defining Value in Cancer Care WCOE: Employment Issues, Health Systems, Defining Value in Cancer Care
LOOC 10year logo whbg NCCS Invites Washington, DC Residents to Create a Community Art Mural to Honor Those Touched by Cancer
patient-centered oncology medical home NCCS Offers Comments on Alternative Payment Models for Cancer Care as Part of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)
docandpatient WCOE: UnitedHealthcare’s Expanded Participation and Consumer Understanding of Insurance Basics

Latest News

NCCS Founders at 1990 Assembly

The Birth of the Cancer Survivorship Movement and How It Transformed Cancer Care for Millions

March 25, 2021
Guest Post by Judith L. Pearson Best-Selling Author of From Shadows to Life: A Biography…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/10-Founders-1990-NCCS-Assembly.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-03-25 10:36:202021-03-25 13:46:05The Birth of the Cancer Survivorship Movement and How It Transformed Cancer Care for Millions
HHS Humphrey bldg 1200

Biden Rescinds Trump Admin Proposal to Limit Medicare Part D Coverage of Drugs in “Six Protected Classes”

March 19, 2021
This week, the Biden administration rescinded a Trump administration-proposed plan…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/HHS-Humphrey-bldg-1200.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-03-19 13:36:192021-03-23 14:46:18Biden Rescinds Trump Admin Proposal to Limit Medicare Part D Coverage of Drugs in “Six Protected Classes”
CDC Headquarters

NCCS Recommends That States Allocate COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer Care Providers

March 1, 2021
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) and the Cancer Leadership Council…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/CDC_Headquarters_PHIL_pubdomain_1200.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-03-01 15:49:432021-03-04 17:45:07NCCS Recommends That States Allocate COVID-19 Vaccines to Cancer Care Providers

Take Action

Stovall Award

The Ellen L. Stovall Award for Innovation in Patient-Centered Cancer Care is a unique opportunity for patients and survivors to recognize pioneers who are transforming the cancer care system.

Join CPAT

The NCCS Cancer Policy & Advocacy Team (CPAT) is a program for survivors and caregivers to learn about pressing policy issues that affect quality cancer care in order to be engaged as advocates in public policy around the needs of cancer survivors.

Share Your Story

NCCS represents the millions of Americans who share a common experience – the survivorship experience – living with, through and beyond a cancer diagnosis.

STAY CONNECTED

Together we can improve cancer care for survivors! Sign up to be the first to know about cancer policy issues and ways to take action

  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Our Leadership
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • 2020 State of Cancer Survivorship Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Telehealth
    • Survivorship Champions
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Cancer Convos Podcast
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • Nominations
      • Honorees
      • Sponsors
      • Committees
    • From Shadows to Life: A Biography of the Cancer Survivorship Movement
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2021 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Fall 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Symposium 2020
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
8455 Colesville Road  |  Suite 930  |  Silver Spring, MD 20910
877-NCCS-YES  |  info@canceradvocacy.org
Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 1995-2021 by the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, NCCS, Cancer Survival Toolbox, and related Logos are registered in the United States as trademarks of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.

Exploring Access to Unapproved Therapies Access to Unapproved Therapies PACT Act Addressing the Gaps in Treatment Planning and Coordination with the PACT Act...
Scroll to top

Harmar Brereton, MD

Founder
Northeast Regional Cancer Institute

 

“Perhaps one of the most impactful collaborations in Dr. Brereton’s extraordinary career remains his early work and long friendship with Ellen Stovall. Through him, and in turn through the thousands of lives he has touched, Ellen’s work continues, and her mission lives on.”

—Karen M. Saunders
President, Northeast Regional Cancer Institute