• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Rss
  • Store
  • Donate
NCCS - National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • The 1986 Club
    • Our Team
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • State of Survivorship Survey
      • 2022 Survey
      • 2021 Survey
      • 2020 Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Advocate Engagement Opportunities
    • Survivorship Champions
    • Subscribe to NCCS Updates
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State-Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Cancer Rehabilitation
    • Integrative Oncology
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Telehealth
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • 2022 Winners
      • Awardees
      • Reception and Sponsorship
      • Committees
      • Nominations
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable (CPR)
      • Fall 2022 CPR
      • Spring 2022 CPR
      • Fall 2021 CPR
      • Spring 2021 CPR
      • Fall 2020 CPR
      • Spring 2020 CPR
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Virtual Symposium 2022
    • 2022 State of Survivorship Survey Results
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • 0Shopping Cart

Your generous year-end donation will be matched $1 for $1    DONATE

Fotolia 23428619 S e1461260836640

NCCS Joins Letter Expressing “Serious Reservations” About “Right to Try” Legislation

March 5, 2018/in Cancer Policy Blog, Congress, FDA, NCCS News, Policy Comments Access to Care, Clinical Trials NCCS News, Policy Comments
NCCS joined with colleagues in the Cancer Leadership Council to express serious reservations about proposed “right to try” legislation that will remove the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from the approval process for patient access to an investigational therapy outside a clinical trial. NCCS does not believe that right to try legislation removing FDA from the expanded access process will protect the interests of people with cancer and in fact may do harm to cancer patients. NCCS and the Cancer Leadership Council urge opposition to right to try bills if they are brought to the House floor for a vote.

NCCS is mindful of the wishes of patients for access to all possible treatment options, which may include access to investigational therapies outside a clinical trial. We have worked diligently over many years to improve the process for obtaining access to investigational agents, and we are pleased that we now have processes and procedures in place that result in timely FDA approval of almost all expanded access requests submitted by physicians and companies for patients who cannot participate in trials and have life-threatening illnesses. We believe the current FDA process for reviewing expanded access requests meets the needs of patients.

Read the full letter below.


CANCER LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

A PATIENT-CENTERED FORUM OF NATIONAL ADVOCACY ORGANIZATIONS
ADDRESSING PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES IN CANCER

February 16, 2018

The Honorable Paul Ryan
Speaker
House of Representatives

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Minority Leader
House of Representatives

The Honorable Greg Walden
Chair, Energy & Commerce Committee
House of Representatives

The Honorable Frank Pallone
Ranking Member, Energy & Commerce Committee
House of Representatives

Dear Speaker Ryan, Leader Pelosi, Chairman Walden, and Ranking Member Pallone:

The undersigned cancer patient organizations, professional societies, and research organizations are writing to express serious reservations about “right to try” legislation that will remove the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from the approval process for patient access to an investigational therapy outside a clinical trial. We do not believe that this legislation will protect the interests of people with cancer and urge opposition to right to try bills if they are brought to the House floor for a vote.

Our organizations are dedicated to a cancer care system – including cancer research and development, regulatory review, and care delivery – that provides patients access to the best possible treatments without delay. Our public policy efforts are focused on assuring the delivery of the right treatment to the right patient at the right time. We are mindful of the wishes of patients for access to all possible treatment options, which may include access to investigational therapies outside a clinical trial, and we believe the current FDA process for reviewing expanded access requests meets the needs of patients.

We have worked diligently over many years to improve the process for obtaining access to investigational agents, and we are pleased that we now have processes and procedures in place that result in timely FDA approval of almost all expanded access requests submitted by physicians and companies for patients who cannot participate in trials and have life-threatening illnesses. Additional reforms recently enacted by Congress will likely, when fully implemented, address any lingering inefficiencies in the expanded access program.

These reforms include the provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act requiring companies to post expanded access policies on their websites and requiring clarification from FDA regarding the use of adverse event data for drugs obtained through expanded access. The Food and Drug Administration Reauthorization Act (FDARA) included a provision permitting Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to appoint a single individual to review expanded access applications instead of requiring full IRB review, and this provision of FDARA may address a barrier that slowed the expanded access process for some.

We also note the work of the Reagan-Udall Foundation in establishing a compassionate use navigator program to help patients and their physicians in managing the expanded access process, including obtaining information about drug manufacturers’ policies on expanded access.

Patients will not be well-served by eliminating the role of FDA in reviewing expanded access requests. The agency has the expertise and experience to evaluate compassionate use applications and to assess potential risk and benefit to the patient. We believe that patients are protected by the engagement of FDA in this process.

The agency approves most requests for expanded access, but the agency of course cannot mandate that companies will make drugs available. In our experience, the major obstacle to drugs being available for expanded access requests is the limited supply of drugs that are still being investigated in clinical trials. The right to try legislation cannot address this issue, yet the bills can do harm by eliminating the important role of FDA in balancing risk and benefit to patients.

The most effective means for assuring patient access to new therapies is an efficient system of research and therapy development and rigorous and efficient regulatory review. Our organizations have contributed in many ways to improving the clinical research system and accelerating the development of new therapies. FDA has responded with urgency to the demand for new treatments by engaging in efforts to improve clinical trial design, in its approach to meetings and communication with sponsors, and in its efficiency in new drug review. The agency has also been engaged in efforts to address clinical trial enrollment criteria – an issue some of our organizations have also addressed – which may result in removing clinical trial participation barriers and may thereby enhance access to investigational therapies.

The patients, providers, and researchers we represent are among those who are pressing hard for faster access to new therapies. The reforms discussed above—to the expanded access process, to the clinical trials system, and to regulatory review—are critical to improving patient access to new therapies and saving the lives of cancer patients. We do not believe that right to try legislation removing FDA from the expanded access process is necessary and in fact may do harm to cancer patients.

We look forward to working with you on efforts to ensure access to quality care for all cancer patients. We do not believe that right to try legislation is consistent with that goal and urge your opposition to it.

Sincerely,

Cancer Leadership Council
American Society of Clinical Oncology
CancerCare
The Children’s Cause for Cancer Advocacy
Fight Colorectal Cancer
Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association
International Myeloma Foundation
The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
Lymphoma Research Foundation
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
Prevent Cancer Foundation
Sarcoma Foundation of America
Susan G. Komen

# # #

Download the full letter » [PDF]


Read more NCCS Policy Comments »

Tags: clinical trials, Congress, drug approvals, FDA, policy comments, right to try
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Fotolia_23428619_S-e1461260836640.jpg 515 1030 actualize https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png actualize2018-03-05 11:40:182018-03-05 11:40:18NCCS Joins Letter Expressing “Serious Reservations” About “Right to Try” Legislation

Latest News

NCCS Letter to HHS

NCCS Urges CMS to Preserve Access to DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

June 1, 2023
Today, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hosted a public meeting, in which they sought input on its decision to…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/HHS-Humphrey-bldg-1200-1030x515-1.jpg 515 1030 Kara Kenan https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png Kara Kenan2023-06-01 16:53:292023-06-01 16:53:29NCCS Urges CMS to Preserve Access to DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Webinar – Survivorship at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center: Creating a Practical Workflow

May 12, 2023
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) hosted a Survivorship Champions webinar about survivorship care implementation,…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/Atrium-Health-Wake-Forest-Baptist-update-POST.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2023-05-12 12:42:192023-05-12 21:48:11Webinar – Survivorship at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center: Creating a Practical Workflow

Sandra Finestone, PsyD: Be Bold and Don’t Hesitate – A 30-year Survivor’s Advice on Advocacy

May 8, 2023
Advocate Spotlight: Sandra Finestone, PsyD A cancer diagnosis can be overwhelming and life-changing, but for Sandra Finestone, it…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/Sandra-Finestone-Advocate-Spotlight-Blog-Banner.png 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2023-05-08 13:42:472023-05-11 10:49:23Sandra Finestone, PsyD: Be Bold and Don’t Hesitate – A 30-year Survivor’s Advice on Advocacy

Take Action

Make An Impact

We are relentless in improving the quality of care and life after a cancer diagnosis. Your support makes all the difference right now.

Make a Gift »

Join CPAT

The NCCS Cancer Policy & Advocacy Team (CPAT) is a program for survivors and caregivers to learn about pressing policy issues that affect quality cancer care in order to be engaged as advocates in public policy around the needs of cancer survivors.

Share Your Story

NCCS represents the millions of Americans who share a common experience – the survivorship experience – living with, through and beyond a cancer diagnosis.

STAY CONNECTED

Together we can improve cancer care for survivors! Sign up to be the first to know about cancer policy issues and ways to take action

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • The 1986 Club
    • Our Team
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • State of Survivorship Survey
      • 2022 Survey
      • 2021 Survey
      • 2020 Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Advocate Engagement Opportunities
    • Survivorship Champions
    • Subscribe to NCCS Updates
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State-Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Cancer Rehabilitation
    • Integrative Oncology
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Telehealth
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • 2022 Winners
      • Awardees
      • Reception and Sponsorship
      • Committees
      • Nominations
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable (CPR)
      • Fall 2022 CPR
      • Spring 2022 CPR
      • Fall 2021 CPR
      • Spring 2021 CPR
      • Fall 2020 CPR
      • Spring 2020 CPR
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Virtual Symposium 2022
    • 2022 State of Survivorship Survey Results
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
8455 Colesville Road  |  Suite 930  |  Silver Spring, MD 20910
877-NCCS-YES  |  info@canceradvocacy.org
Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 1995-2023 by the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, NCCS, Cancer Survival Toolbox, and related Logos are registered in the United States as trademarks of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.

What Caught Our Eye: NCI Chief Sharpless Interviewed; Expert Patients; “Why...NCCS Starburst 250pxNCCS Policy Comments DOL LaborNCCS Letter to DOL: Proposed Association Health Plans Rule “Will Increase...
Scroll to top
Download the Survey Report

"*" indicates required fields

Fill out the form below, and we’ll send the survey report, detailed presentation, and infographic to your email.
Name*
I am a...*
Select any/all that apply.
Consent*
By downloading the survey materials, you will receive updates and information from NCCS via email, which you may unsubscribe from at any time. Your information will never be sold to any third parties.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Get Updates From NCCS

Be the first to hear about cancer policy and survivorship issues! Subscribe and receive the biweekly NCCS Health Care Roundup, invites to webinars and events, and more.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Connect With Us

Twitter     Facebook     Instagram     LinkedIn     YouTube

Harmar Brereton, MD

Founder
Northeast Regional Cancer Institute

 

“Perhaps one of the most impactful collaborations in Dr. Brereton’s extraordinary career remains his early work and long friendship with Ellen Stovall. Through him, and in turn through the thousands of lives he has touched, Ellen’s work continues, and her mission lives on.”

—Karen M. Saunders
President, Northeast Regional Cancer Institute