• Facebook
  • Rss
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Store
  • Donate
NCCS - National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Our Leadership
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • 2020 State of Cancer Survivorship Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Telehealth
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Cancer Convos Podcast
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • From Shadows to Life: A Biography of the Cancer Survivorship Movement
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • 2020 Stovall Awards
      • Honorees
      • Sponsors
      • Committees
      • Reception
      • Nominations
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Fall 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Symposium 2020
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • 0Shopping Cart

Year-End MATCH (DEADLINE Dec 31): Donate & Make a Difference | Donate

NCCS Policy Comments DOL Labor

NCCS Letter to DOL: Proposed Association Health Plans Rule “Will Increase Costs for Cancer Survivors and Others with Significant Health Needs”

March 8, 2018/in Cancer Policy Blog, Department of Labor, NCCS News, Policy Comments Access to Care, Affordable Care Act NCCS News, Policy Comments /by actualize

The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) submitted comments on the proposed rule on Association Health Plans (AHPs) and expressed serious reservations that the proposed rule will weaken the individual and small group markets that provide health insurance coverage to many Americans with a history of cancer.

For those who now receive their insurance through AHPs, cost of coverage may be reduced. However, the coverage offered in AHPs may well be inadequate for all but those with near-perfect health. Cancer patients will likely find that AHP coverage will not meet their care needs.

NCCS believes that the proposed rule on AHPs fails to honor the goals of the Executive Order to improve coverage and affordability of health insurance for Americans. The proposed rule, if finalized as drafted, would also leave consumers at risk of fraudulent and insolvent AHPs. The action that would be in the interest of American health care consumers would be the withdrawal of the proposed rule and a reconsideration of the standards for AHPs to ensure that coverage through AHPs meets the standards and protections of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Read the full letter below.


NCCS Logo

 

March 6, 2018

The Honorable R. Alexander Acosta
Secretary
Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210

Re: Definition of Employer Under Section 3(5) of ERISA – Association Health Plans (RIN 1210-AB85)

Dear Secretary Acosta:

The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS), a national organization representing survivors of all types of cancer in efforts to protect access to quality cancer care for all, appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule on Association Health Plans (AHPs).

We have serious reservations that the proposed rule will weaken the individual and small group markets that provide health insurance coverage to many Americans with a history of cancer. For those who now receive their insurance through AHPs, cost of coverage may be reduced. However, the coverage offered in AHPs may well be inadequate for any but those with near-perfect health. Cancer patients will likely find that AHP coverage will not meet their care needs.

The Department of Labor has undertaken this effort to revise the regulations governing AHPs consistent with the Executive Order of fall 2017, which urged several departments to take action to expand the range and address the affordability of health plan choices for Americans. The proposed rule falls short of that aim, as it will increase costs for cancer survivors and others with significant health care needs who rely on the individual and small group markets. Moreover, cancer patients and others with serious and life-threatening illnesses who receive coverage through AHPs may find their coverage to be inadequate. On the critical measure of protecting Americans’ access to adequate and affordable insurance coverage, the proposed rule falls short. In fact, it moves the health insurance system in the wrong direction on both counts.

Coverage and Affordability in AHPs

The proposed rule would permit AHPs to be considered a multi-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The so-called “look through” doctrine established in a 2011 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance subjects AHPs sold to individuals and small groups to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirements and consumer protections. If the proposed rule is finalized, the “look- through” doctrine would no longer apply.

Under the proposed rule, AHP coverage would no longer be subject to essential health benefit requirements. Based on past experience with AHP coverage, we anticipate that maternity care, prescription drug coverage, and mental health coverage would be among the benefits that might be at risk in AHP plans. For people with cancer, the elimination of the prescription drug coverage would make AHP coverage wholly inadequate, as drugs are typically part of multi-disciplinary cancer care.

Although the proposed rule prevents AHPs from undertaking health status rating of separate employers, the rule would appear to allow groups or associations to base premium rates on other factors, including gender, age, industry, and other factors that estimate health care utilization. Small businesses that have employees who are older, disproportionately women, or likely to be high health care utilizers might be subject to higher premiums. These increased premiums would be passed along to individual consumers.

The proposed rule would apply the HIPAA nondiscrimination provisions to AHPs. Although we applaud this provision of the proposed rule, we note that AHPs can engage in a variety of actions that will result in discrimination against people with significant health needs. As discussed above, AHPs will have flexibility in establishing premium rates and in benefit design, and this power with regard to premiums and benefit design will result in discouraging people with significant health needs from enrolling in AHPS and will result in healthier groups enrolling in AHP coverage. Discrimination against those with significant health needs will be accomplished in spite of the HIPAA protections.

The proposed rule may lead to AHP coverage that is affordable for young and healthy Americans. However, even those consumers will find their coverage inadequate if they encounter any health issues, including a cancer diagnosis, during the plan year. For those consumers who have health conditions that require treatment, the affordability of coverage will be of little comfort if the coverage is wholly inadequate.

The solution to these problems of affordability and adequacy of coverage would be to retain the “look-through” doctrine if the AHP is offering coverage to individuals and small employers. This would ensure that ACA protections remain in place for AHPs for these populations.

Notification of Consumers Regarding Minimum Value

The Departments requests information about required notices to consumers in AHPs. We urge that AHPs be required to provide notice to employer groups and possible beneficiaries regarding the plans offered and whether they meet standards for minimum value. The notices should also advise beneficiaries that, if plans do not meet minimum value standards, they have a right to receive coverage through the health insurance marketplaces and they may also be eligible for premium assistance.

We recommend that employer groups and potential beneficiaries be notified that AHPs do not cover certain essential health benefits. They should also be notified of appeal rights, summary of benefits and coverage, and summary plan descriptions.

Disruption of the Individual and Small Group Markets

We are concerned that the coverage that is offered through AHPs will be inadequate for all but the healthiest Americans. Many individuals are healthy and without health care needs until the moment of their diagnosis with cancer. As a result, we are concerned about the exposure to significant health care costs that will result from AHPs.

Despite our misgivings about the inadequacy of AHP coverage, both because of limited benefits and significant cost-sharing requirements, we believe these plans will be aggressively marketed and purchased by younger and healthier Americans. This will result in market segmentation and a risk pool in the individual and small group markets of older Americans who are above average utilizers of health care. For cancer patients who rely on coverage through the individual and small group markets, premiums will increase and adequate coverage may be beyond their reach.

Retain Standards and Regulatory Authority that Prevent Fraud in AHPs

We recommend that the commonality of interest test be retained for AHPs. The commonality of interest test requires employers participating in an AHP to show a commonality of interest and prevents them from forming an AHP solely for the purpose of offering insurance. The commonality of interest test has been one of the protections against AHPs that commit fraud and experience financial insolvency. This test is one means of protecting consumers from purchasing coverage that is fraudulent or purchasing from an entity that goes bankrupt in the middle of a benefit year.

The proposed rule goes aggressively in the opposite direction, by encouraging employers to form associations SOLELY for the purpose of offering health insurance. The proposed rule is also unclear on the preemption of state law. We urge that the Department clarify that those entities considered single employer AHPs would have to comply with laws in the states in which they operate and continue to be subject to state oversight and regulation. Retaining state authority would help protect consumers from AHPs that are fraudulent or insolvent.

* * *

NCCS believes that the proposed rule on AHPs fails to honor the goals of the Executive Order to improve coverage and affordability of health insurance for Americans. The proposed rule, if finalized as drafted, would also leave consumers at risk of fraudulent and insolvent AHPs. The action that would be in the interest of American health care consumers would be the withdrawal of the proposed rule and a reconsideration of the standards for AHPs. This reconsideration should result in a proposal ensuring that coverage through AHPs meets the standards and protections of the ACA.

Sincerely,

Shelley Fuld Nasso, MPP
Chief Executive Officer

# # #

Download the full letter to the Department of Labor » [PDF]


Read more NCCS Policy Comments »

Related Posts

https://canceradvocacy.org/policy-comments/nccs-letter-serious-reservations-right-to-try-legislation/

https://canceradvocacy.org/blog/aca-update-jan-5-2018/

Tags: affordable care act, Association Health Plans, cancer care, Department of Labor, policy comments
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/NCCS-Policy-Comments-DOL-Labor.jpg 600 1200 actualize https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png actualize2018-03-08 13:05:512018-03-08 13:05:51NCCS Letter to DOL: Proposed Association Health Plans Rule “Will Increase Costs for Cancer Survivors and Others with Significant Health Needs”
You might also like
Study Reports Nurse Navigators Make a Difference Guest Post: Study Reports Nurse Navigators Make a Difference
NCCS Starburst 250px Health Care Roundup: Kaiser Health Insurance Survey; House Holds Medicare-for-All Hearing; CBO Analysis of Health Subsidies; More
SuperHero Posesquare NCCS Session at CancerCon 2015 Presents Two Types of Advocacy
AARP Magazine, My Patient, My Teacher Dr. Nancy Snyderman’s “My Patient, My Teacher”
161013 NCCS Reception 065 NCCS Marks 30 Years of Cancer Survivorship Advocacy
Jennifer Groves SM Remembering Jennifer Friar Groves
20years Guest Post from The Cancer Support Community: Progress Made in Addressing the Psychosocial Needs of People Diagnosed with Cancer
NCCS Starburst 250px Health Care Roundup: FDA’s Gottlieb Steps Down; Hearings on High Costs; Coping with Cancer’s Aftermath; Why Insurers Deny Claims; More

Latest News

Coronavirus feat

COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer: A Conversation with Cancer Expert Otis Brawley, MD

March 1, 2021
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) hosted a conversation on February…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Coronavirus-feat.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-03-01 11:49:192021-03-02 16:15:47COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer: A Conversation with Cancer Expert Otis Brawley, MD
Canceradvocacy org default image

National Quality Forum Names NCCS CEO Shelley Fuld Nasso to 2021 Leadership Consortium Roster

February 24, 2021
NOTE: This press release was originally published on the National Quality Forum (NQF)…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Canceradvocacy-org-default-image.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-02-24 21:01:392021-02-24 21:01:39National Quality Forum Names NCCS CEO Shelley Fuld Nasso to 2021 Leadership Consortium Roster
HHS Humphrey bldg 1200

NCCS and Other Cancer Groups Urge HHS to Keep Six Protected Classes in Medicare Part D Drug Plans

February 19, 2021
The National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS) joined with the Cancer Leadership…
Read more
https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/HHS-Humphrey-bldg-1200.jpg 600 1200 NCCS Staff https://canceradvocacy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NCCA-Logo.png NCCS Staff2021-02-19 15:06:392021-02-24 19:29:10NCCS and Other Cancer Groups Urge HHS to Keep Six Protected Classes in Medicare Part D Drug Plans

Take Action

Stovall Award

The Ellen L. Stovall Award for Innovation in Patient-Centered Cancer Care is a unique opportunity for patients and survivors to recognize pioneers who are transforming the cancer care system.

Join CPAT

The NCCS Cancer Policy & Advocacy Team (CPAT) is a program for survivors and caregivers to learn about pressing policy issues that affect quality cancer care in order to be engaged as advocates in public policy around the needs of cancer survivors.

Share Your Story

NCCS represents the millions of Americans who share a common experience – the survivorship experience – living with, through and beyond a cancer diagnosis.

STAY CONNECTED

Together we can improve cancer care for survivors! Sign up to be the first to know about cancer policy issues and ways to take action

  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Our Leadership
      • Policy Advisors
    • Employment
    • Partnerships
    • Financial Information
  • Policy
    • Quality Cancer Care
    • Access to Care
    • Health Equity
    • Redefining Functional Status (RFS)
    • 2020 State of Cancer Survivorship Survey
    • Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act (CCPCA)
  • Get Involved
    • What is Advocacy?
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT)
    • Elevating Survivorship
    • Survivor Stories
    • Cancerversary
    • State Based Cancer Advocacy
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Resources for Cancer Survivors
    • Survivorship Checklist
    • Cancer Survival Toolbox
    • Telehealth
    • Publications
      • Talking With Your Doctor
      • Self Advocacy
      • Employment Rights
      • Remaining Hopeful
    • Cancer Convos Podcast
    • Taking Charge of Your Care
    • Care Planning for Cancer Survivors
    • Tools For Care Providers
    • Order Our Resources
  • News
  • Events
    • From Shadows to Life: A Biography of the Cancer Survivorship Movement
    • Ellen L. Stovall Award
      • 2020 Stovall Awards
      • Honorees
      • Sponsors
      • Committees
      • Reception
      • Nominations
    • Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Fall 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
      • Spring 2020 Cancer Policy Roundtable
    • Cancer Policy and Advocacy Team (CPAT) Symposium 2020
    • Webinars
  • Contact Us

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
8455 Colesville Road  |  Suite 930  |  Silver Spring, MD 20910
877-NCCS-YES  |  info@canceradvocacy.org
Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 1995-2021 by the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, NCCS, Cancer Survival Toolbox, and related Logos are registered in the United States as trademarks of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.

NCCS Joins Letter Expressing “Serious Reservations” About “Right... Fotolia 23428619 S e1461260836640 Fotolia 23428619 S e1461260836640 Reps. DeSaulnier and Poe Introduce Bipartisan “Cancer Care Planning and Communications...
Scroll to top

Harmar Brereton, MD

Founder
Northeast Regional Cancer Institute

 

“Perhaps one of the most impactful collaborations in Dr. Brereton’s extraordinary career remains his early work and long friendship with Ellen Stovall. Through him, and in turn through the thousands of lives he has touched, Ellen’s work continues, and her mission lives on.”

—Karen M. Saunders
President, Northeast Regional Cancer Institute